Research Article

The Philosophical Criticism Towards the Scientific Determination of Time-of-Death

Ranti Putriani
Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
* Corresponding author
Mohammad Mukhtasar Syamsuddin
Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Hardono Hadi
Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
DOI icon 10.24018/theology.2022.2.6.87

Read Counter
480

Downloads
406

Citations

Share

Article Sidebar

Submitted 2022-11-26
Published 2022-12-21

Read counter = 480 times

Table of Contents

Article Main Content

Determination of time-of-death is closely related to the mortality criteria. In prehistoric times, the criteria of death were narrated through the event of the body being evacuated from the spirit or soul leaving the human body. Along with the development of science in the modern era, scientists argue the criteria of biological death and clinical death. This study projected to critically philosophically analyze the time-of-death determination related to scientific criteria. The methods used in the data analysis stage were historical, hermeneutic, comparative, and critical reflection. The results showed that the scientific criteria of death were inadequate to be used in the determination of time-of-death. Time-of-death objectively existed as a separate reality outside of human beings and its existence was absolutely determined or influenced by the existence of other realities. Time-of-death ontologically meant the end of life; epistemologically signified the absence of life and had no mysterious nature; axiologically it was a symbol or metaphor of human powerlessness to judge and determine the continuity of life.

Keywords: Philosophy Criticism, Scientific Determination, Time-of-Death.

References

  1. Aristotle. (1990). On the Soul: Selected Works. Mintis: Lithuania.
     Google Scholar
  2. Bernat, J.L., Culver, C.M., Gert, B. (1981). On the Definition and Criterion of Death. Ann International Medicine, 94, pp. 389-394.
     Google Scholar
  3. Brugger, E. C. (2013). D. Alan Shewmon and the PCBE’s White Paper on Brain Death: Are Brain-Dead Patients Dead? Journal of Medicine and Philosophy. https://doi.org/10.1093/jmp/jht009.
     Google Scholar
  4. Cornford, Francis MacDonald. (1997). Plato and Parmenides: Parmenides’ Way of Truth and Plato’s Parmenides. New York: The Bobbs-Merril Company.
     Google Scholar
  5. DeGrazia, D. (2002). The Definition of Death. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from: http://plato.stanford.edu/http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/death-definition/.
     Google Scholar
  6. Derrida, J. (1995). The Gift of Death. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
     Google Scholar
  7. Gordon, A., & Schwabe, C. (2004). The Quick and the Dead: Biomedical Theory in Ancient Egypt (Egyptological Memoirs) (1st Edition). Brill.
     Google Scholar
  8. Gert, Bernat, Culver, C.M., Clouser, K.D. (2006). Bioethics: A Systematic Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
     Google Scholar
  9. Gumauskaite, V. (2003). The History of Medical Rationality as Archeology. Journal of Philos Sociol, 4, pp. 3-10.
     Google Scholar
  10. Gurko, E.J.J. (2001). Derrida Deconstruction: the Texts and Interpretations. Minsk, pp. 166-167.
     Google Scholar
  11. Hershenov, D.B. (2006). The Death of a Person. Journal of Medical Philosophy, 31, pp. 107-120.
     Google Scholar
  12. Jones, D.A. (2012). Loss of Faith in Brain Death: Catholic Controversy over the Determination of Death by Neurological Criteria. Clin Ethics, 7, pp. 133-141.
     Google Scholar
  13. Lettineck, P. (1994). Aristotle’s Physics and its Reception in the Arabic World. Leiden: Brill.
     Google Scholar
  14. Lizza, J.P. (2005). Potentiality, Irreversibility, and Death. Journal of Medical Philosophy, 30, pp. 45-64.
     Google Scholar
  15. Manninen, BA. (2009). Defining Human Death: An Intersection of Bioethics and Metaphysics. Rev Neurosci, 20(3-4), pp. 283-292.
     Google Scholar
  16. Moody, H.L.B. (1971). The Teaching of Literature with Special Reference to Developing. USA: Longman.
     Google Scholar
  17. Natori I. (2011). Legal Determination of Brain Death. JMAJ, 54(6), pp. 363-367.
     Google Scholar
  18. Ouspensky, P.D. (1922). Tertium Organum: The Third Canon of Thought, A Key to The Enigmas of the World. Translated by Nicholas Bessaraboff. New York: Claude Bragdon.
     Google Scholar
  19. Pellegrino, E.D. (2009). Controversies in The Determination of Death (Personal statement of Edmund D. Pellegrino). Retrieved from: http://bioethics.georgetown.edu/pcbe/reports/death/pellegrino_statement.html.
     Google Scholar
  20. Saldukaityte, J. (2010). Ontological Difference and Metaphysics. Journal Problemos, 77, pp. 15-27.
     Google Scholar
  21. Shemie, S.D., Hornby, L., Baker, A., Teitelbaum, J., Torrance, S., Young, K., et al. (2014). International Guideline Development for the Determination of Death. Intensive Care Med., 40(6), pp. 788-797.
     Google Scholar
  22. Shewmon, D. A., & Shewmon, E. S. (2004). The Semiotics of Death and its Medical Implications. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 89-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-306-48526-8_8.
     Google Scholar
  23. Shewmon, D.A. (1997). Recovery from Brain Death: A Neurologist’s Apologia. Linacre Quarterly, 64(1), pp. 31-96.
     Google Scholar
  24. Varava, V.V. (2005). Metaphysics of Death: Experience Apophatic Rationality. Journal of Philos Sociol., 12, pp. 77-92.
     Google Scholar
  25. Wilson, N. G. (2006). Encyclopedia of Ancient Greece. London and New York: Routledge.
     Google Scholar
  26. Wijdicks, E.F.M. (2006). The Clinical Criteria of Brain Death Throughout the World: Why Has It Come to This? Can J. Anesth., 53(6), pp. 540-543.
     Google Scholar
  27. Youngner, S.J., Bartlett, E.T. (1983). Human Death and High Technology: The Failure of The Whole-Brain Formulations. Ann International Medicine, 99, pp. 252-258.
     Google Scholar


Most read articles by the same author(s)